Opioid Addicts in Indiana Contract HIV

aaaaaaaaaaaaindianaThe New York Times ran an article 5/5/15 about a small town in rural Indiana that is facing a relative epidemic of new cases of HIV.

Austin, Indiana, a town of only 4200, has more than 140 people just diagnosed with HIV. The town is struggling to understand what to do about this epidemic, since the area has had a low HIV rate in the past.

The new cases of HIV were intravenous opioid addicts, and Opana was specifically mentioned by the opioid addicts in the article.

As in many small towns, needle exchange has been met with resistance from citizens who feel giving free needles to addicts only serves to encourage them to use more drugs.

Fortunately, the Indiana governor has authorized a needle exchange program for the area where addicts were sometimes using the same needle as many as three hundred times. Unfortunately, the needle exchange is not being run according to best practices. People must sign up for the service. Obviously, many opioid addicts who could benefit from free new needles are hesitant to register with anyone, due to the shame and stigma associated with addiction in this country.

To add to the difficulty, local police still arrest any addict found with needles, unless they are enrolled with the needle exchange. In other words, if one addict signs up for needle exchange and distributes these new needles to other drug users, those users could still get arrested if the police find their needles. Police say they are doing this to force addicts to register with the needle exchange.

We already know, from decades of studies, that actions like these by the police erode trust in the whole needle exchange program. Studies show needle exchange works best when people aren’t asked to register, and are allowed to procure free needles for other people who won’t come to a needle exchange. These type programs are very effective at halting the spread of HIV

The article only tangentially mentions treatment; it says some intravenous drug users have gone to a residential treatment center about 30 miles away, and others remain on a waiting list.

Sadly, no mention is made of medication-assisted treatment of opioid addiction with buprenorphine and methadone.

I did my own research: residents of Austin can drive to an opioid addiction treatment center less than a half hour away, in Charlestown, Indiana Also, there are at least two OTPs in Louisville,, only a few minutes farther, in Kentucky.

I hope someone is telling all the opioid addicts about this option. We know that after an opioid-addicted person enters medication-assisted treatment, the risk of contracting HIV drops at least three-fold. Thankfully HIV can now be treated, and is more like a chronic disease than the death sentence it was twenty-five years ago, but wouldn’t it be better to prevent HIV in the first place?

I fear Austin, Indiana is a harbinger of things to come in other small towns in our nation. Let’s stop with the politics, and get patients into medication-assisted treatment. Let’s do unrestricted needle exchange, and let’s hand out naloxone kits!

Advertisements

4 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Boston NAMA on May 7, 2015 at 1:29 am

    I avoided contracting HIV and HCV because of the Boston Needle Exchange program.. Needles are finally available at pharmacies now but if not for the van that provided clean works I surely would be dead.

    Paul

    Reply

  2. Enjoy reading your blog and thanks for this article! I work for SelfRefind, a company that owns 20 clinics around KY & OH that treat opiate addicts, and we do MAT. We have a location in Louisville that’s fairly new and would be happy to see any of those affected in Austin.

    Reply

  3. And the latest MMWR shows that the hep c rates are very directly tied to substance use:

    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6417a2.htm?mobile=nocontent&s_cid=mm6417a2_w

    But my question is this: why is he still trying to restrict access by forcing counties to “prove” they have an epidemic? How many have to die before evidence and science-based policies can be properly implemented.

    I think even with the temp-to-perm change on the needle exchange, on balance, he still doesn’t get it.

    Reply

  4. Posted by Andrew angelos on May 12, 2015 at 6:19 pm

    I believe that what your saying is very true. I was an out of control addict for 10 + years. I had a lovely wife and family. I knew about suboxone from using it on the street. I then got into a program and been in for a year and a half. Unfortunately the stigma you speak of is the true problem. I’ve been doing great. My program has weekly drug tests and meetings even after a year and a half. I’ve had one dirty test last April. I’ve gotten a job and my wife trusts me again. Two weeks ago my doc said that one of the big ins company’s said they will no longer pay for addiction services. On that note the program is over. I live in a small town in Northern California. There are 2 other programs within about a 1 hour drive bolth will take a minimum of 3 months to get into if not longer . Unfortunately when the doc doesn’t get paid they don’t really care what happens to their paitents at least in this case. The suboxone programs work. Something has to be done to secure these treatment programs for addicts. The cost of treatment is a fraction of the cost of tearing family’s and people apart. It makes me angry that we have the tools to help people live a normal life after addiction we should make them more available.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: