Media Maintains Methadone is Menacing Mountains



Last week, a colleague of mine directed my attention to local news coverage of the opioid use disorder epidemic. It’s a four-part series titled “Paths to Recovery.”

Anytime the press covers opioid use disorder and its treatments, I feel hope and dread. I hope the report will be fair and unbiased, and give the public much-needed information. And I dread the more likely stigmatization and perpetuation of tired stereotypes about methadone as a treatment for opioid use disorder.

Overall, the four segments of this news report had some good parts, and some biased parts. It was not a particularly well-done series, and could have benefitted from better editing. It was disjointed and contained non-sequiturs, which I suspect confused viewers.

In the introduction to the first segment, the report says their investigators have spent months digging into treatment options in the area. Their conclusion: there’s a variety of options and treatment is not one-size-fits-all. The report goes on to give statistics about how bad the opioid use disorder situation has become, and they interviewed a treatment worker who says we’re two years in to this, and the community doesn’t grasp the seriousness of the situation. They also interviewed some harm reduction workers, and discussed naloxone rescue for overdoses and needle exchange.

So far, so good, except that of course we are more like two decades into the opioid crisis, not two years.

Part two of this series was “Mountain methadone clinics.” As soon as I saw the dreadful alliteration, I cringed, fearing the content of the segment.

This report didn’t say good things about methadone. In fact, one physician, supposedly the medical director of a new opioid treatment program in the area, says on camera, “Methadone is very dangerous. It has some effects on the heart. The rhythm of the heart, it has some drug interactions.” He went on to say that at the right dose, people could feel normal, and that it replaced the endorphins that were lacking, but I worry people will remember only that a doctor said methadone was a very dangerous drug.

Methadone can be dangerous, if you don’t know how to prescribe it, or if you give a person with opioid use disorder unfettered access to methadone. But in the hands of a skilled and experienced physician, at an opioid treatment program with observed dosing, methadone can be life-saving.

The news report outlined the failings of existing methadone programs in the area, saying staff had inadequate training, and failed to provide enough counseling for patients. It said one program made a dosing error and killed a patient, while another program had excessive lab errors.

All of that sounds very bad.

No positive aspects were presented as a counterpoint to that bleak picture. I felt myself yearning for an interview with a patient on methadone who has gotten his family back, works every day, and is leading a happy and productive life. Of course, those people are hard to find, since they are at work and harder to find by the media, even reporters who have supposedly been “working for months” on this story.

And then…of course they interviewed patients who had misused methadone. One person criticized his opioid treatment program because they allowed him to increase his dose to 160mg per day, and he said “…that’s a lot. I didn’t need that much…” and goes on to admitting to selling his take home medication. Another patient said the methadone made him “sleep all the time.” Another patient said methadone made him “high all the time.”

There will always be such patients…ready to lie to treatment providers to get more medication than needed, break the law by selling that medication, and then blame it all on the people trying to help them. Unable to see their own errors, they blame it all on someone else, or on the evil drug methadone.

Every program has such patients. But these people can also be helped, if they can safely be retained in treatment long enough, and get enough counseling.

Even though these patients are few, they get far more media attention compared to the many patients who want help and are willing to abide by the multitude of rules and regulations laid on opioid treatment programs by state and federal authorities. These latter patients are why I love my job. I see them get their lives back while on methadone. They become the moms and dads that they want to be. They go back to school. They get good jobs and they live normal lives. They don’t “sleep all the time,” as the patients on this report said.

But not one such patient was interviewed for this report.

As I watched this segment, I thought back to an interview the A. T. Forum did with Dr. Vincent Dole, one of the original researchers to study methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorders. This was in 1996, before our present opioid crisis gained momentum.

A.T. FORUM: It seems that, over the years, methadone has been more thoroughly researched and written about than almost any other medication; yet, it’s still not completely accepted. How do you feel about that?

  1. VINCENT DOLE:It’s an extraordinary phenomenon and it has come to me as a surprise. From the beginning of our research with methadone we were able to rehabilitate otherwise hopeless addicts that had been through all of the other treatments available. I expected methadone would be taken up very carefully by the addiction treatment community, but with some enthusiasm. Instead of that, we’ve had endless moral and other types of objections which are really irrelevant to the scientific data.

I was surprised, because my background in research had led me to expect that the medical community was a very critical but nonetheless objective group that would respond to solid, reproducible data. Instead I find that we still get the anti-methadone argument of substituting one addictive drug for another.

This is ignoring the scientific data showing that, as a result of methadone treatment, people who have been hopelessly addicted and anti-social and excluded from any normal life or family, are in a wonderful way becoming responsive to social rehabilitation and today constitute a very large number of people who are living normal lives. The fact that people, especially medical practitioners, would dismiss that as unimportant simply staggers me!

[ ]


What would Dr. Dole think now, twenty more years later, during a terrible wave of death from opioid use disorders, about the continued stigmatization of methadone?

Then next segment was about buprenorphine, and how it can be prescribed in a doctor’s office, making it a better choice for patients. It wasn’t a bad segment, and contained some useful information. Physicians who were interviewed had nothing but good things to say about buprenorphine.

Or rather, they had good things to say about Suboxone.

The brand Suboxone was heavily promoted by this piece. Not once did the reporter use the drug’s generic name, buprenorphine. Every time, the medication was called by its brand name, Suboxone, and every picture of the medication was of Suboxone film. No mention was made of the other brands: Zubsolv, Bunavail, Probuphine, or even that there are generic combination buprenorphine/naloxone equivalents for Suboxone film, for less than half the price.

I know buprenorphine is kind of a mouthful for non-medical reporters, but still, I thought it was odd to use only the name of one brand: Suboxone. It’s as if this was a commercial for that drug company. Indivior, the manufacturer of Suboxone, must be delighted with this coverage. To me, it felt like an advertisement rather than journalism.

Another segment was about sober recovery homes. The investigative reporter talked to owners of sober recovery houses and the tenants at those homes. She said NC has no regulations or standards for recovery homes. She talked on screen to a patient advocate who says patient brokering is going on in Asheville, as well as lab scams at recovery homes where the patients’ best interests aren’t at the heart of the way these homes function.

She talked to Josh Stein, NC Attorney General, about passing laws to better regulate these sober homes, and he agreed that if these laws were needed, they should be passed.

No controversy with that one.

There was a segment about how there’s not enough beds in residential facilities for patients with opioid use disorder who want help. I agree, though I’m not sure this is breaking news for anyone. I don’t think there’s ever been enough beds to meet the treatment need.

Overall, I was left with a bitter taste after this reportage. The news program missed an opportunity to educate viewers about all evidence-based treatments for opioid use disorder, but ended up doing an advertisement for Suboxone and denigrating methadone.

Buprenorphine and methadone both work under the same principle: they are long-acting opioids which, when dosed properly, prevent withdrawal and craving while also blocking illicit opioids. While buprenorphine is a safer drug with fewer drug interactions, it isn’t strong enough for everyone. Methadone has countless studies to support its use to treat opioid use disorder, showing it reduces death, increases employment, decreases crime… but why go on, since facts don’t seem to matter as much as sound bites.

In my opinion, WLOS bungled an opportunity.


5 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Brooke Stanley on November 13, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    This is so disappointing. I am always amazed by how it seems to be the “anti methadone” folks that are being interviewed and not the people, like me, that’s life has been saved by methadone. To your point though, people like me are busy with their AMAZING new lives. However, I, personally, never find myself too busy to express what MMT has done for me and how it has positively impacted my life. I am proud to be a patient at a clinic that holds me accountable and acknowledges my progress. Nearly five years ago, I made the difficult decision to re-enter treatment and begin again on methadone. I had had four very successful years of recovery, while in treatment at another clinic in a different county. Within in a couple months of exiting treatment (and a year spent tapering down), I was plagued with symptoms of Post Acute Withdrawal Syndrome and was on the verge of losing everything that I worked so hard to get back. As humbling as it was to begin again, it was the best thing I have ever done. I worked my way back up again, earning my levels and rebuilding my life. I have two amazing jobs in the human services field. I have a nice home, a reliable car and a beautiful family. My oldest son is a junior at Appalachian State University and I am blessed to be able to pay for his college education….not because I am rich, but because I am stable and responsible…qualities that I learned while in treatment. How cool is that?!? I say this all the time and I will say it again, I am thankful for my addiction, because without it, I wouldn’t know life in recovery. I am thankful for methadone and for the clinic that I am a patient at. I am certain that without the methadone, I would be just another statistic. Will I be on methadone the rest of my life? Maybe…and that is just fine with me.

    Dr. Burson, thank you for not only being an incredible doctor, but for being a fierce advocate for people like me. You are truly making a difference.


  2. Posted by Kayce Victoria on November 14, 2017 at 11:32 am

    I sit in a waiting room at my clinic with a few people that are taking advantage of the wonderful opportunity were given through MMT! I bite my tongue because its not my place, but oh how i wish i could comment on their immaturity! Abusing their medication, blaming the clinic for any little issue they have even if its their fault & responsibility. It blows my mind at how little they’ve grown and i have to wonder if some people ever grow up. That’s how I describe addiction, immaturity. I enjoy following your work, you give me hope and courage to stand up for my clinic and the methadone treatment programs when i can! Thank you!

    P.S. Can a judge tell you to get off of your prescribed meyhadone? Is that not breaking any Federal Laws? I’m having trouble finding a legitimate answer.


  3. Posted by Robert Williams on March 12, 2018 at 6:10 am

    I am one of the succes stories, in regards to the use of methadone, that most reports reflect as ” Hard to Find Examples “. In the mid to late ’90s, I had two rather traumatic accidents. Over approximately a year and a half, after a couple of cervical spine surgeries (also diagnosed, during pre-surgery testing, with spinal stenosis) and a couple of shoulder surgeries, I was prescribed fairly heavy doses of the more traditional or accepted opioids for pain. During that time, I found it progressively difficult to control the intake. In short, I started wanting to abuse my prescriptions.
    I have never used alcohol or tobacco products, so not being able to control this with what I had considered to be a willpower that could overcome anything. I did manage to get away from these opioids only to realize that I was still dealing with a good deal of pain. After a barrage of testing to determine how best to treat my persistent pain, two Drs. agreed that I would need to try to manage the pain with medication. That was the last thing I was wanting to hear, given the struggles I had with my earlier experience with pain meds. Before going forward with their recommendations to treat my pain with medication and physical therapy, a friend, who happened to be a pharmacist, asked if I had any knowledge of a drug called Methadone. I had not, but he went on to explain it was more readily used to treat addiction, but some Pain Management Drs. used it as a pain management alternative. Before I even entertained the notion of pursuing that option, I did some extensive research on the topic of “Methadone for Pain”. I also consulted with a Dr. of Addiction Medicines to discuss the differences between Methadone and the more traditional prescriptive pain relievers. Only after some counseling as to expectations and red flags for which to watch, I proceeded cautiously. That was in 2001. I have successfully used Methadone to treat my pain since the day I started in 2001. Since then, I have worked as an Operations Consultant for a Fortune 500 company and am currently working as a production manager.
    I do realize that my story might be the exception, but I felt compelled to comment tonight on this topic because not only do I think my voice should carry more weight than the voices of the many that seem to use their voices to simply try to dismiss what I consider to be a viable option for some people. I’m not saying anyone should enter into any type of treatment where medication is concerned without giving that medication it’s due respect. Include your family members as you research and as you go through counseling. The more support you have, the better! It also doesn’t hurt to put more and more people into our population that can speak intelligently about METHADONE as a real option to treat pain long term. I have no doubt in my mind that I could never have taken traditional opioids and stayed in control, which in turn gave me a quality of life that would have otherwise been so difficult to achieve, like I have with Methadone!!!! It has truly been a life saver for me and I was able to continue to support my family instead of having to pursue disability benefits.
    Hopefully this ” Hard to Find ” example has shed a small beam of light on this debate in order to open other’s minds so that they can see that there is always another way to look at any situation. Thank you for this opportunity to make my voice heard. I hope it helps someone that finds himself/herself in a similar situation.


  4. Reblogged this on My Sharing Blog.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: