Archive for the ‘Law Enforcement Behaving Badly’ Category

Access to Buprenorphine Will Expand; News About CARA

aaaaaaaaaaa

 

 

 

Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced it was raising the limit on the number of patients each doctor can treat for opioid use disorder with buprenorphine, from the present cap of 100 patients to 275 patients. However, each doctor must first meet criteria and complete an application procedure to be approved for this higher limit.

Initially, HHS wanted to increase the limit to 200 but for some reason ended up with 275. It’s still an arbitrary number, and opioid use disorder remains the only disease to have patient enrollment limits legislated for physicians.

HHS still wants physicians to meet extra requirements before they are approved to accept 275 patients, as I blogged about in my May 8, 2016 post:

  • Have professional coverage for after-hours emergencies.
  • Provide case management services
  • Use electronic medical records
  • Must use that practitioner’s state prescription monitoring program
  • Accept third-party insurance
  • Have a plan to address possible diversion of prescribed buprenorphine medication
  • Re-apply for permission to treat up to 275 patients every three years
  • Supply yearly reports about their practice and their buprenorphine patients

For some of the reasons I names in my May 8th blog, at this time I’m not planning to request permission to treat more than 100 patients.

This measure by HHS is a good and positive thing, and will help more desperate people get treatment. Just because I have a few objections to several HSS’s requirements doesn’t mean other doctors will feel the same way. I expect many physicians treating opioid use disorder will undergo the procedure to expand their patient limit.

 

Meanwhile, both the House of Representatives and the Senate passed the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA) as of last week, and the bill is going before the President for his signature.

This bill, considered weak by some members of the House, contained only a fraction of the requested money to treat addiction. However, other advocates for addiction treatment say even a weak bill is better than none.

CARA’s content addresses the following:

Expand availability of naloxone to law enforcement and first responders, in order to quickly reverse opioid overdoses and prevent deaths. I think our own Project Lazarus helped get this ball rolling many years ago, and I’m so grateful my OTP has had support from them to give our patients naloxone kits!

Expand education and prevention efforts toward teens, parents, and aging people to prevent drug abuse and promote treatment and recovery.

Encourage states to improve their prescription monitoring systems. I hope some of that money will be directed to interoperability, meaning it will be easier to access a neighboring state’s prescription monitoring program. I also hope the Veteran’s administration will start reporting their data about prescribed controlled substances, too.

Prohibit the Department of Education from rejecting financial aid for people who have had past drug offences. I didn’t know people with drug offences on their record were denied governmental financial aid. If we want people to improve themselves and their life situations, why would we deny help for them? So this measure in CARA is great.

Expand resources to identify and treat incarcerated people with substance use disorders using evidence-based treatments.

Great idea, about forty years late.

Expand drug disposal sites to keep leftover meds out of the hands of children.

Just a question I’ve always had…Of all the tons of medication which have been collected at these disposal sites, has anyone ever studied how much controlled substances are collected?

Launch a “medication assisted treatment and intervention demonstration program.”

Not sure exactly what this will look like, but good luck with all of that.

I feel like I’ve beaten my head against the brick wall of prejudice and stigma against MAT in my community for four years. All I have is a headache…and resentment towards the medical community. I’d be very happy if someone else wants to take over for a while.

Launch a program to promote evidence-based treatment of opioid use disorder.

Well, yeah. it needs to happen. Actually it needed to happen about fifteen years ago, but whatever.

Director money towards law enforcement, to get people with substance use disorders help, rather than incarceration. CARA wants law enforcement to be able to work with addiction treatment services.

I indulged a private snicker at that last one. What a change from only a few years ago.

About six years ago, I was trying to educate people about medication-assisted treatment of opioid addiction. I thought I could help educate law enforcement personnel about addiction treatment, since they encounter it so much. I used the internet to find a journal for law enforcement.

I wrote to the editor, offering to write an educational article for their publication about opioid addiction treatment. My hopes weren’t especially high, but I wanted to give it a shot.

I was surprised when the journal’s editor took the time to call me in person. I was so excited!

Then the editor started talking to me like I was a naughty child. He asked what made me think it was appropriate to waste his time with such a query letter. He said I should have known better than to think any of his readers would be interested in the kind of thing I was offering to write, and he was calling to see what kind of person would be so unwise as to think otherwise.

I was stunned. I regret my reaction to him. I was so taken aback that I started apologizing to him, and said I was so sorry for bothering him and wasting his time.

In reality, he behaved like an asshole. If he didn’t want to waste time, he could have passed on the urge to call me to tell me how stupid he thought I was.

I wish I would have stuck up for myself in that conversation. I like to think I would handle it differently today.

Anyway, now, six years later, the government earmarked money to help law enforcement learn about opioid use disorder treatment.

While writing this article, I’ve come to realize I have bitterness towards people in law enforcement, medical fields, judicial, etc…when they denigrated my efforts to educate them about medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.

I don’t want this bitterness. It’s too hard on me. It’s a weight that interferes with my enjoyment of life, and I’m going to release it.

The tide has begun to turn. We have legislation addressing the terrible opioid addiction problem we have, and money earmarked to help the problem. I want to be able to work with people who may have said bad things about medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorders in the past. I want to work with those people without feeling resentment and without indulging in sarcasm.

Updates: Law Enforcement Behaving Badly

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaapopo

Michigan:

Last week, a federal judge ruled the lawsuit against Macomb County, Michigan, and against county Sherriff Anthony Wickersham could go forward. The lawsuit was filed by the family of David Stojcevski, who died several weeks into a jail sentence given to him for unpaid traffic tickets. The autopsy showed he died from untreated prescription medication withdrawal.

This case has received media attention after the family decided to release a multi-day video recording, taken by the jail, showing David’s gradual and painful death, as he received little if any medical attention. The video documents his fifty pound weight loss, poor appetite, onset of seizures, and his eventual death from prescription opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal.

 

The FBI is also investigating this case, after the Justice Department asked them to get involved.

This story “has legs,” meaning it’s getting more media attention from news outlets like ABC News and NPR. This is probably because of the release of the disturbing video; I’ve seen bits of it and it is disturbing, to put it mildly.

The county sheriff still denies any wrongdoing on the part of the jail staff, and says Macomb County will fight the civil suit.

It’s really hard for me to understand how this sheriff feels he and his staff have no responsibility for this inmate’s slow death. The inmate died of a condition that’s not only treatable, but also preventable, yet received no medical care. The company hired to provide medical care to jail inmates has been dropped from the lawsuit, which speaks volumes. To me, this implies no one from the medical group was summoned to care for the patient. If they had been summoned, surely the responsibility would have shifted to them.

At any rate, I hope the family gets a check with lots of zeros in it, not that any amount of money will erase the family’s sorrows.

Locally

In another law enforcement fail, another of my patients reported that a county deputy confiscated his naloxone kit. The kit we gave him was funded through Project Lazarus, just like the last patient’s kit.

All over the country, there’s a push to get naloxone kits delivered to people with opioid addiction, their families, first responders, anyone who wants a kit. The FDA just approved the nasal kits for use in opioid overdoses. States and provinces in the U.S. and Canada started initiatives to distribute these life-saving kits. Even President Obama has specifically endorsed the distribution of naloxone kits.

It feels really frustrating to work so hard at distributing kits, only to have our local law enforcement confiscate them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inmate Dies From Withdrawal, FBI will investigate

aaaaaaaaaades

An interesting article from this week’s issue of Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly caught my eye today. On page 4 is the article, “Video of jail drug-withdrawal death leads to FBI inquiry.” This seized my attention, since I view the awful treatment of U.S. prisoners as one of our nation’s biggest moral failings. I get particularly agitated when patients enrolled in medication-assisted treatment for addiction are denied access to medical care.

This story is heart-wrenching.

In June of 2014, David Stojcevski , 32 years old, was jailed in the Macomb County, Michigan, jail for thirty days for failure to pay a traffic ticket. He was denied access to his usual medications; news sources said he was being prescribed methadone, Klonopin, and Xanax for the treatment of addiction. No mention was made of whether he was a patient of an opioid treatment program.

David died seventeen days into his thirty day sentence. His autopsy listed the cause of death as “Acute withdrawal from chronic benzodiazepine, methadone, and opiate medication,” and also mentioned seizures and dehydration as contributing factors.

A jail nurse, noting his medical condition upon intake to the jail, recommended he be sent to a medical detox unit, but her recommendations were not heeded. Instead, when Mr. Stojcevski began behaving in unusual ways, he was sent to a mental health cell, where he was monitored with video around the clock. He was supposed to have personnel checking on him every fifteen minutes. Apparently his withdrawal symptoms were so severe he declined meals and lost 50 pounds within these eleven days. He had what appear to be seizures as he lay on the jail floor dying.

Understandably, David’s family was livid. In order to illustrate the jail’s indifference to their son’s suffering, they posted all 240 hours of the video monitoring on the internet, where it went viral. David’s family is seeking to change the way prisoners on medications are treated, to avoid senseless deaths like David’s. They have also filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the county and against Correct Care Solutions, the company which was supposed to have provided medical care to prisoners in the county jail.

I have often heard my patients describe the callous indifference jailers have toward them as they withdrawal from legally prescribed medication, but it’s quite another thing to actually watch this man die slowly. I only saw a few clips from the local news program above, and was horrified. It does not take any medical knowledge to see how this man was suffering. He became thinner, wasn’t eating, and didn’t get off the jail floor for the last two days of his life. At the very end, he has some agonal respirations, what looks to me like seizure activity, and then becomes still.

Then jail personnel crowd into his cell.

Too little, too late. He’s already dead and can’t be revived.

Some of the frames were televised on the area’s local news segment and can be seen here: http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/man-jailed-for-ticket-dies-in-custody/35452790
Be warned this segment is not for the faint of heart.

This man died from a treatable condition, opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal.

An addiction expert interviewed by the area’s local television statement called the treatment of this man “unconscionable.”

I could quibble about the appropriateness of prescribing two benzodiazepines to a person with addiction in the first place, but since that’s not the point of this blog post, that’s all I’ll say about that.

Just yesterday, local TV news said the ACLU had filed a request for a formal Justice Department investigation of the Macomb County jail, saying prisoners are having their civil rights violated by the actions at the jail. The ACLU has also asked for an investigation into the judge’s decision to imprison David after he was unable to pay his traffic ticket, creating what was in essence a “debtor’s prison.”

A representative of the ACLU said anyone watching the video could deduce there was “Something systemically wrong at the Macomb County Jail.”

Recently, the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. contacted the FBI, asking them to investigate this case for evidence of criminal behavior on the part of Macomb County jail staff.

Macomb County officials steadfastly maintain they did nothing wrong, have nothing to hide, and welcome investigations into David Stojcevski’s death.

What I saw on this video clip appears criminal to me. The neglect, the reckless disregard for the wellbeing of another human is a far more serious crime than David’s traffic ticket. Every person who worked in that jail who turned a blind eye to the dying man belongs on the other side of the bars.

I am grateful to David’s family for their decision to post this painful video. That had to be a hard decision, but David’s graphic suffering causes more impact than written descriptions. I wonder if the ACLU, Justice Department, and FBI would have gotten involved had his family not publicized David’s gradual death, and had it not gone viral.

This behavior on the part of law enforcement is stupid, inhumane, and egregious. Do these law enforcement personnel have no shame, no basic human decency? Are we in a third world country where prisoners have no rights?

I will follow this story and give updates when possible.

I’d love to see the FBI investigate, and I hope criminal charges are filed. I hope the family sues and wins millions of dollars. I hope something can finally change in county jails across the nation, so that people who are incarcerated are no longer denied medical care.

Healthcare Misadventures

facepalm1

There’s a whole lot of stupid going on right now.

For some reason, I’ve been encountering healthcare “fails” this week, all relating to the treatment of opioid addiction. That’s a shame, because otherwise it’s been a really good week. But this stuff cannot go unreported. I’m changing some of the minor circumstances of each example, in order to preserve patient confidentiality, so if you think you know who I’m talking about, you don’t.

1. A patient I admitted recently into treatment had been doing well on methadone at another opioid treatment program. He needed a minor surgical procedure, and his surgeon refused to operate on him unless/until he got off methadone. This patient was told being on methadone could “complicate” the surgery. The patient tapered off his dose, had the surgery, and was prescribed Dilaudid tablets for post-op pain. Predictably, the patient relapsed and started injecting the medication.

Thankfully this patient didn’t die during the relapse. He came to our treatment program, and was admitted back into a treatment which had worked for him for over three years.

He blames himself for the relapse, and feels like he failed. I blame the surgeon, who apparently has little knowledge about the disease of addiction. The way I see it, this surgeon could not have done a more efficient job of causing this patient to relapse.

2. One of our patients was pulled over for a traffic violation by a county sheriff. He had a naloxone kit in his car. The deputy confiscated it because it was not prescribed for the patient.

I know law enforcement personnel don’t make the laws, but shouldn’t they have at least some rudimentary knowledge about what it illegal and what isn’t?

Two years ago, the Good Samaritan Bill was passed to allow, among other things, access to naloxone without a prescription. It’s common to see stories about naloxone on the television news, in newspapers, and on the internet.

We have Project Lazarus and the Harm Reduction Coalition spending time, energy, and money to make sure overdose prevention kits containing naloxone are available to every citizen who may come into contact with a person suffering from an overdose.

And right behind them, this sheriff’s deputy confiscates them.

I don’t need to say more. That speaks for itself.

3. CVS is trying to ruin my life.

I’ve had a few patients say that their CVS pharmacy has been giving them a hard time about filling buprenorphine prescriptions. Patients get a little nervous, understandably, about running out of medication early, because of the physical suffering this would bring. Many patients like to call their pharmacies in advance, just to make sure their medication is in stock.

Several patients over the last three weeks have told me they get scolded by the pharmacists for doing this, as if the patient is scheming to get an early prescription. Yet if patients wait until the day they are due, the pharmacy often says they are out of the medication and it must be ordered, which will take a day or two. I’ve heard this from eight or ten patients over the last two weeks, and all of them go to a CVS pharmacy.

A few months ago, one of my patients called, asking for help with her pharmacist. This patient worked out of town on some weeks, and she and wanted to pick up the monthly prescription on a Monday morning. The pharmacist refused, saying she wasn’t due to pick it up until Monday evening.

Huh? This sounded weird even for CVS, so I called. Sure enough, this pharmacist told me that she could not release the new prescription even with a doctor’s order until Monday evening. I told the pharmacist that this patient was doing very well and had been stable for over a year, but I was talking to a brick wall.

We solved this problem. I canceled the prescription at CVS and called a new one in to another pharmacy, where my patient was able to pick it up on her way to work out of town.

Last week, after I wrote a prescription for a buprenorphine brand, the pharmacist called my office and spoke to Daniel, my Health Services Manager. The pharmacist said it was “new state law” that doctors had to write on the prescription what the diagnosis was and whether it was for pain or addiction.

Daniel gave me the message between patients, and he saw me sigh deeply and roll my eyes. He said, “I’ll handle it. The “X” number you write on the prescription is only used for addiction, right? So there’s no need to write anything else.”

Yes, he was right. He has no pharmacy experience and has worked part time in my office for about three months, but he knew that much. So I kept seeing patients and he called the CVS pharmacist back.

Apparently she was insistent, and claimed it was a brand new state law. She didn’t know Daniel has a great deal of intellectual curiosity. After he got off the phone, he scoured the internet, determined to find out who was right.

The pharmacist was wrong. No such state law exists. Perhaps it is a new CVS law, but it’s not a state law. Because, as intended, an “X” DEA number is used only when treating patients for addiction.

Daniel wanted to fax the pharmacist a copy of the pertinent section of North Carolina law for pharmacies, but I asked him not to, as it would be fruitless.

“Oh,” he said, “She’s fact-resistant.”

I love that phrase. I’ve started using it.

May we never be fact-resistant.

A Letter to Law Enforcement About Medication-assisted Treatments

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaapopo

Dear Officer Zealous:
First of all, thank you for patrolling our streets and highways and your efforts to keep them safe. I know you have a hard job and I deeply appreciate your willingness to take on this responsibility.

However, please stop arresting my patients for whom I’ve prescribed methadone and buprenorphine (better known under the brand names Suboxone, Subutex, or Zubsolv). You mistakenly think all people taking these medications have no right to be driving, and you are wrong. I’m writing this letter to give you better information that you can use to do your job better.

Our nation is in the middle of a crisis. Opioid addiction is an epidemic, and too often its sufferers die of overdoses. Medication-assisted treatment with methadone and buprenorphine works very well to prevent overdose deaths, and it’s been proven to help patients have a better quality of life in recovery.

I doubt you’ve been provided any information about medication-assisted treatment, so I want to help you learn some facts. Methadone has been around for fifty years and has a proven track record. It’s been studied more than perhaps any other medication, and we know it does a great job of treating opioid addiction. Buprenorphine has only been available in the U.S. for about 13 years, but has been used in Europe for decades.

With both methadone and buprenorphine, the proper dose of medication should make the patients feel normal. Patients should not feel intoxicated or high, and should not feel withdrawal symptoms. Methadone and buprenorphine are both very long-acting opioids, and they both give the opioid addicts a fairly steady level of opioid, compared to short-acting opioids usually used for intoxication. Therefore, using methadone to treat opioid addiction is not “like giving whiskey to an alcoholic,” as has incorrectly been asserted. The valid difference lies in the unique pharmacology of methadone. Opioid addicts can lead normal lives on this medication, when it is properly dosed.

In addition, both of these medications block other opioids at the opioid receptor. When a patient is on an adequate dose, she won’t feel euphoria from another opioid. Both methadone and buprenorphine deter use of other opioids for the purpose of getting high.

Treatment of opioid addiction with methadone and buprenorphine is endorsed by the CSAT (Center for Substance Abuse Treatment) branch of SAMHSA, by the U.S.’s Institute of Medicine, by ASAM (American Society of Addiction Medicine), by AAAP (American Association of Addiction Psychiatry), and by NIDA (National Institute of Drug Addiction. In study after study, methadone has been shown to reduce the risk of overdose death, reduce days spent in criminal activities, reduce transmission rates of HIV, reduce the use of illicit opioids, reduce the use of other illicit drugs, produce higher rates of employment, reduce commercial sex work, and reduce needle sharing. Medication-assisted therapy is also high cost effective.

Indeed, the current debate of government officials at the highest levels has been how best to expand medication-assisted treatment with methadone and buprenorphine, not to make it less available. So please don’t do anything which may discourage opioid addicts from receiving life-saving treatment.

Over the years, many studies have been done on methadone and buprenorphine to see if patients are able to drive safely on either of them. In study after study, data show patients on stable doses of both medications can safely drive cars, operate heavy equipment, and perform complex tasks. Please see the list of references at the bottom of this letter if you wish to investigate for yourself.

I’m not saying, however, that patients on methadone or buprenorphine can’t become impaired. Impairment can occur if patients are given too high a dose of methadone or buprenorphine, which most often occurs during the first two weeks of treatment. For that reason, patients are warned not to drive if they ever feel sedated or drowsy.

Patients on medication-assisted treatment can also become impaired if they mix other drugs or medications with their methadone or buprenorphine. In fact, benzodiazepines (like Xanax, Valium, Klonopin) and alcohol act synergistically with maintenance opioids. They can cause impairment with smaller amounts of alcohol or benzos than expected. And of course, patients can still become impaired with other drugs, such as marijuana.

As you probably know, a urine drug screen isn’t adequate to detect impairment. The urine screen only tells you if the person has taken a given drug or medication over the last few days to weeks. Drugs are detectable in the urine long after the impairing effect wears off, so you must demonstrate the presence of drugs with a blood test at the time of the questioned impairment.

My family and I drive these roads too, and I don’t want impaired drivers on our highways any more than anyone else. I just think you have mistakenly targeted patients on medication-assisted treatment for the disease of opioid addiction.

I know you have formed bad opinions about methadone and buprenorphine patients from seeing both drugs misused on the street. I hate that, because you probably rarely get to see more typical patients on medication-assisted treatments.

The vast majority of my patients have jobs, families, and responsibilities that they meet, despite having this potentially fatal illness of opioid addiction. If you are fortunate enough to encounter one of my patients on a random traffic stop, please don’t give them a hard time. Please congratulate them on having the courage to find recovery from addiction, and tell them to do what works for them. In some patients, that’s medication.

Thanks for reading this long letter and thanks for all you do in the name of keeping our roads safe. If you want to know more about how we treat opioid addiction at our facility, please call our program manager at xxx-xxx-xxxx and we would be happy to provide you with an after- hours tour and lots of information.
Sincerely,

Jana Burson M.D.
Member of the American Society of Addition Medicine
Board certified in Internal Medicine
Certified by the American Board of Addiction Medicine

P.S. And please don’t attempt to intimidate patients from coming to get help for this fatal illness of opioid addiction by parking your squad car just outside our facility’s entrance. Some of these patients may have old warrants, but by stalking them where they come for help, you discourage people who want to escape addiction and want to better their lives. If you do park near us, you should expect a staff member to approach you with a smile, a cup of coffee, and a pile of information about opioid addiction and its treatment.

ATTACHMENT:

Methadone and Driving Article Abstracts
Brief Literature Review
Institute for Metropolitan Affairs
Roosevelt University 2/14/08

1. DRIVING RECORD OF METHADONE MAINTENANCE PATIENTS IN NEW YORK STATE
BABST, D., NEWMAN, S., & State, N. (1973). DRIVING RECORD OF METHADONE MAINTENANCE PATIENTS IN NEW YORK STATE. DRIVING RECORD OF METHADONE MAINTENANCE PATIENTS IN NEW YORK STATE,
When a comparison was made within specific age groups, it was learned that the accident and conviction rates were about the same for methadone maintenance clients as for a sample of New York City male drivers within the same period. The findings from other related studies discussed in this booklet are consistent with the results in this study.

2. The effects of the opioid pharmacotherapies methadone, LAAM and buprenorphine, alone and in combination with alcohol, on simulated driving.
Lenné, M., Dietze, P., Rumbold, G., Redman, J., & Triggs, T. (2003, December). Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 72(3), 271.
These findings suggest that typical community standards around driving safety should be applied to clients stabilized in methadone, LAAM and buprenorphine treatment.

3. Maintenance Therapy with Synthetic Opioids and Driving Aptitude.
Schindler, S., Ortner, R., Peternell, A., Eder, H., Opgenoorth, E., & Fischer, G. (2004). Maintenance Therapy with Synthetic Opioids and Driving Aptitude. European Addiction Research, 10(2), 80-87
Conclusion: The synthetic opioid-maintained subjects investigated in the current study did not differ significantly in comparison to healthy controls in the majority.

4. Methadone-substitution and driving ability
Forensic Science International, Volume 62, Issues 1-2, November 1993, Pages 63-66
H. Rössler, H. J. Battista, F. Deisenhammer, V. Günther, P. Pohl, L. Prokop and Y. Riemer
The formal assertion that addiction equals driving-inability, which is largely practiced at present, is inadmissible and therefore harmful to the therapeutic efforts for rehabilitation.

5. Methadone substitution and ability to drive. Results of an experimental study.
Dittert, S., Naber, D., & Soyka, M. (1999, May).
It is concluded that methadone substitution did not implicate driving inability.

6. Functional potential of the methadone-maintenance person.
Gordon, N., & Appel, P. (1995, January). Functional potential of the methadone-maintenance person. Alcohol, Drugs & Driving, 11(1), 31-37.
Surveys on employability and driving behavior of MTSs revealed no significant differences when compared to normal population. It is concluded that MM at appropriate dosage levels, as part of treatment for heroin addiction, has no adverse effects on an individual’s ability to function.

Opioid Addicts in Indiana Contract HIV

aaaaaaaaaaaaindianaThe New York Times ran an article 5/5/15 about a small town in rural Indiana that is facing a relative epidemic of new cases of HIV.

Austin, Indiana, a town of only 4200, has more than 140 people just diagnosed with HIV. The town is struggling to understand what to do about this epidemic, since the area has had a low HIV rate in the past.

The new cases of HIV were intravenous opioid addicts, and Opana was specifically mentioned by the opioid addicts in the article.

As in many small towns, needle exchange has been met with resistance from citizens who feel giving free needles to addicts only serves to encourage them to use more drugs.

Fortunately, the Indiana governor has authorized a needle exchange program for the area where addicts were sometimes using the same needle as many as three hundred times. Unfortunately, the needle exchange is not being run according to best practices. People must sign up for the service. Obviously, many opioid addicts who could benefit from free new needles are hesitant to register with anyone, due to the shame and stigma associated with addiction in this country.

To add to the difficulty, local police still arrest any addict found with needles, unless they are enrolled with the needle exchange. In other words, if one addict signs up for needle exchange and distributes these new needles to other drug users, those users could still get arrested if the police find their needles. Police say they are doing this to force addicts to register with the needle exchange.

We already know, from decades of studies, that actions like these by the police erode trust in the whole needle exchange program. Studies show needle exchange works best when people aren’t asked to register, and are allowed to procure free needles for other people who won’t come to a needle exchange. These type programs are very effective at halting the spread of HIV

The article only tangentially mentions treatment; it says some intravenous drug users have gone to a residential treatment center about 30 miles away, and others remain on a waiting list.

Sadly, no mention is made of medication-assisted treatment of opioid addiction with buprenorphine and methadone.

I did my own research: residents of Austin can drive to an opioid addiction treatment center less than a half hour away, in Charlestown, Indiana Also, there are at least two OTPs in Louisville,, only a few minutes farther, in Kentucky.

I hope someone is telling all the opioid addicts about this option. We know that after an opioid-addicted person enters medication-assisted treatment, the risk of contracting HIV drops at least three-fold. Thankfully HIV can now be treated, and is more like a chronic disease than the death sentence it was twenty-five years ago, but wouldn’t it be better to prevent HIV in the first place?

I fear Austin, Indiana is a harbinger of things to come in other small towns in our nation. Let’s stop with the politics, and get patients into medication-assisted treatment. Let’s do unrestricted needle exchange, and let’s hand out naloxone kits!

Criminally Pregnant In Tennessee, Part II

pregnant caucasian woman portrait attached with handcuffs isolated studio on white background

Today my guest blogger Dr. Fedup weighs in on my last entry, “Criminally Pregnant,” with his own unique point of view. He gives counterpoints to my arguments, as he feels Tennessee’s law is a good idea. I’ll let him explain his reasoning. His political leanings are somewhat right of center, as you will read.

“I applaud Tennessee’s new law, which makes it a crime to expose a pre-born baby (I don’t believe in using that word fetus, since life begins at conception) to drugs. Too many babies are born with neonatal abstinence syndrome, so obviously Tennessee has grown too soft on crime for this to be happening.

“Bill number 1391, already passed by the state’s legislature, needs only the governor’s signature to become law. In short, this bill says a mother can be prosecuted for “an assaultive offense or homicide if she illegally takes a narcotic drug while pregnant and the child is born addicted, is harmed, or dies because of the drug.”

“Their governor, Bill Haslam, goofed last year when he passed that Safe Harbor Law, which eliminated criminal charges for pregnant women who went into treatment. This new law corrects and cancels that law. Some people have said that’s inconsistent, and not enough time passed since the Safe Harbor Law to see if it was going to work or not.

“I say it’s OK to be inconsistent so long as you are putting people in jail.

“There’s nothing in the new bill to prevent pregnant, opioid addicted women who are in methadone or buprenorphine programs from being prosecuted as well, though bill 1391 does say, “Illegally take a narcotic drug while pregnant.” Women who enter such treatments have already taken illegal narcotics while pregnant, or they wouldn’t need treatment.

“My only problem with the new bill, SB 1391, is that it doesn’t go far enough. We should put the drug addict babies in jail, too.

“Think about it. You know those little suckers enjoyed the drugs they were getting through the placenta, and they need to be punished for that. They’re born addicts. Start punishing them right out of the womb. That way, the state can teach them right from wrong as they grow up, right there in the prison system, like we do with all other inmates in Tennessee jails.

“Some people criticize my idea. Some people say we already put too many people in jail. But I say if U.S. history teaches us anything, it’s that taxpayers are always happy to spend more money on jails.

“We must be willing to incarcerate more people, because U.S. citizens are more evil and criminal than people in other parts of the world. They must be, because we put more people in jail per capita than anywhere else. Circular logic? I don’t care, as long as it puts bad people in jail.

“It was a happy day when the U.S. could finally brag that we incarcerate more people per capita, than even Russia or Rwanda. We’re Number One! We put 716 people out of 100,000 into jails or prisons, and Russia only puts 484 out of 100,000 in prisons. We’re beating them almost two to one! [1]

“Lots of bleeding heart liberals will complain about how Tennessee jails aren’t set up for infants. I say we can fix that. After all, aren’t play pens just jail cells, only prettier? These addict babies don’t deserve anything too pretty, and they’ll get used to the bars soon enough.

“No measure is too severe if it will fix the drug problem. My critics point to all the information collected since the 1950’s which indicates incarcerating addicts does nothing to help addiction rates. But I’m telling you that this new send-an-addict-baby-to-jail program will work.

“While we are on the topic of evil pregnant women who harm their babies, let’s discuss nicotine addiction. There’s more medical evidence to show tobacco smoking harms babies than there is to show cocaine harms babies. Let’s put all those mothers who smoke into jail, too, since they are intentionally harming their pre-borns.

“Then let’s take this train of thought to its logical conclusion. In the latest issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, there was a great article about the harm maternal obesity does to the fetus. This article reviewed all of the studies of how obesity affects fetal death and infant death. The conclusion was, “Even modest increases in maternal BMI were associated with increased risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and neonatal, perinatal, and infant death.” [2]

“Sounds to me like it’s time to build jails for the fatties, too. Because the state of Tennessee believes that jail time corrects bad behavior.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate
2. Aune, et al, “Maternal Body Mass Index and the Risk of Fetal Death, Stillbirth, and Infant Death: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” JAMA, 2014; 311(15):1536-1546.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 780 other followers